The following article is a work of satire and fiction and in no way attempts to depict events in real life.
In medicine, the most important clue to resolving the cause of a disease is to identify the trigger. In the case of autism, the exponential increase in the epidemic began in the s is readily documented.
Is it sheer coincidence that beginning inCDC recommended universal vaccination of newborn infants with thimerosal-laced Hepatitis B vaccine? This was the first in a series of three vaccinations to be administered during the first year of life.
The argument that correlation is no proof of causation has been used to prevent meaningful research that could identify the triggers of the autism epidemic.
Instead, the focus of vaccine research has been tightly controlled to searching for a genetic cause, or population surveys in epidemiological studies, neither of which have come close to identifying the triggers for autism.
As a result, these children were consigned to the ministration of psychiatry, whose treatments — i. The corrupting influence of the pharmaceutical industry on medical research and its published literature, has derailed the medical profession from its humanitarian mission and its professional objectivity.
The Wakefield MMR saga is a case study that encapsulates how various, ubiquitous corrupting financial influences have merged, forming an insurmountable coalition: The objective of those who fomented the witch hunt against Dr.
Wakefield was to protect their financial stake in the MMR, and to safeguard public policies that ensure high utilization of vaccines. Vaccine stakeholders were and are determined to suppress independent vaccine safety research that might reveal inconvenient safety problems that could threaten vaccination rates, resulting in decreased profits.
Godlee took principled positions on issues, I admired her.
Godlee stepped so far beyond her legitimate editorial role, and used the authority of her office as the editor-in-chief of a widely read medical journal to pronounce Dr. Andrew Wakefield within the broad medical-scientific community.
As will be documented, Dr. The title of this muckraking editorial declared: Clearly, the editorial and accompanying articles by Deer were crafted for maximum injurious impact, aimed at destroying Dr. For a medical journal to make such serious accusations against a doctor is unprecedented.
The dissemination of the BMJ editorial was steered by a coordinated public relations blitzkrieg of articles, editorials, press releases and CNN interviews that reverberated around the globe.
It accused a researcher, Andrew Wakefield, of outright fraud.
As I will document, no evidence has ever been presented to substantiate the charge of fraud against Dr. When those BMJ conflicts were exposed in [by this author], Dr.
The Wakefield vilification campaign was spearheaded by Murdoch in collusion with UK government officials. An email authored by a Merck executive stated:The experiment: Say you have just conducted the Milgram lausannecongress2018.com you want to write the research paper for it.
(Milgram actually waited two years before writing about his study.) Here's a shortened example of a research article that MIGHT have been written. A briefing paper is a concise summary of research findings, written for an informed, although not necessarily an expert, audience.
Briefing papers are targeted toward a specific audience and for a . William shakespeare research paper Whatever the differences, paper briefing write how to a or variation, in ses and academic achievement is not to dismiss simply .
learned some great tips and trips. However, this book teaches more by showing examples of writing and using annotations to explain what the author of the book felt the author of the brief (or other writing) did correctly/effectively.
Developing a Briefing Paper TN 21 A briefing paper is a summary of facts pertaining to an issue and often includes a suggested course of action.
It consists of a precise statement or set of instructions intended to inform another individual who may have solicited assistance to study and make recommendations on a. In its first two editions, The Winning Brief explained the art of effective writing in concise, practical, and easy-to-use tips, proving that the key to writing well is to understand the judicial readership.